Best Project-Based Time Tracking Software 2026

The best software for tracking hours and margin by client captures hours by client and project, applies cost rates, and compares the result with each retainer, fixed fee, or hourly bill. Rize does the capture automatically and includes client and project profitability reports on its Team plan, which suits retainer agencies and flat-fee accounting firms whose timesheets arrive late. BigTime fits firms that want a full PSA with invoicing, and Harvest fits teams that already log time reliably by hand.

Hours alone do not tell you whether a project is profitable. A fixed-fee engagement can stay busy while its delivery costs consume the fee. Connect reviewed client and project hours with cost rates, revenue, and budgets to see the difference between a well-priced project and one that needs a scope or pricing change.

The gap between "we tracked our time" and "we know which projects make money" is where agencies lose margin without realizing it. Closing that gap requires a specific kind of tool: one that tracks time at the project level, assigns costs, and produces margin data you can act on. Here's what to look for and how five tools compare.

How do you calculate project profitability from tracked hours?

Project profitability compares revenue with the cost of delivering the work, not just the value of billable hours.

Start with each person's actual delivery hours multiplied by their internal cost rate, then add delivery expenses. Count non-billable delivery work such as revisions and client meetings as costs too. A billing rate is what you charge the client; it is not your labor cost. Sage's project profitability guide explains why revenue, labor, expenses, and overhead must be distinguished.

Rize's contract profitability calculation uses agency gross income (AGI): revenue minus pass-through expenses. Contribution equals AGI minus delivery labor cost and delivery expenses. Delivery margin equals contribution divided by AGI, multiplied by 100. This is a delivery margin, not a full business net-profit calculation.

• Illustrative fixed-fee project: $10,000 revenue minus $1,000 pass-through expenses gives $9,000 AGI.
• 100 delivery hours at a $50 internal cost rate plus $500 delivery expenses gives $5,500 delivery cost.
• $9,000 minus $5,500 gives $3,500 contribution; $3,500 divided by $9,000 gives a 38.9% delivery margin.
• With zero AGI, the margin is undefined. Missing cost rates also need attention: Rize's calculation treats entries without a cost rate as zero labor cost.

Rize's client profitability view shows revenue, costs, profit, and margin. Use it to compare clients, then inspect the hours and rates behind a low-margin engagement before changing scope or pricing. Read more about Rize's project profitability reports.

How should you compare Rize, Harvest, and Everhour for profitability?

Compare the source of project hours, the cost-rate setup, and the financial report you need before comparing subscription prices.

Rize fits teams whose missing input is recorded delivery time. Harvest fits an established timer-and-invoice workflow. Everhour's Notion workflow puts timers inside the project workspace and connects entries to budgets, rates, reports, and invoices. An embedded timer and automatic background capture solve different problems: decide whether your team needs easier timer access or fewer timers to remember.

Test each tool with the same client and reporting period: enter the fee, staff cost rates, expenses, and both billable and non-billable delivery hours. Check whether the displayed percentage uses total revenue or revenue after pass-through expenses. Two reports can show different margins even with identical hours if their denominators differ.

What is the best project-based time tracking software for teams?

Rize is the best project-based time tracking software for teams that want hours captured without timers and reported as margin by client and project. Harvest is the alternative for teams that already run manual timers and need invoices from those hours. BigTime is the alternative for professional services firms that need phase-level P&L.

Rize's Team plan costs $29.99 per seat per month billed annually ($39.99 monthly). It includes client and project profitability reporting, budgeting, and team dashboards. Team members get a review window before drafted entries count toward reports, and admins can turn auto-approve off.

Harvest's pricing page lists Teams at $9 to $11 per seat per month and places profitability reporting on its Enterprise tier at $14 to $17. BigTime's pricing page lists Essentials from $20 per user per month. Compare the capture method and the reporting tier, not the list price alone.

What is the top project-based time tracking solution for enterprises?

For enterprises running large project portfolios, BigTime and Celoxis are the established choices: BigTime for professional services P&L and billing, and Celoxis for portfolio planning with timesheets. Rize fits enterprises that want automatic capture across 100 or more seats on a flat-rate Enterprise plan; SSO and SCIM provisioning are on its roadmap.

Rize's Enterprise plan is flat-rate and built for 100 or more seats. SSO and SCIM provisioning are on the roadmap and not yet available. It includes custom contracts with an SLA and a dedicated account manager. Rize's SOC 2 Type II audit is in progress, with no completed report yet, so ask for the current status before a security review.

Celoxis's pricing page lists per-user plans from $10 (Core) to $45 (Business) per standard user per month billed annually, with a custom quote for Enterprise. Celoxis fits PMOs that plan resources across many projects. BigTime fits firms whose billing rules need phase-level margins. Rize fits when the gap is missing hours rather than missing planning tools.

Which project-based time tracking software is mobile-friendly?

Toggl Track, Jibble, and Workyard are the most mobile-friendly options in this list. Toggl Track has iOS and Android apps for starting timers, Jibble clocks people in from mobile, web, or kiosk, and Workyard uses GPS-based clock-in for field crews. Rize's automatic capture runs on the desktop and has no mobile app, so it does not fit phone-based work.

Toggl's pricing page lists Starter at $9 to $12 per user per month and Premium at $16 to $24, depending on billing, and describes iOS and Android apps. Jibble's pricing page says time tracking is free for unlimited users, with desktop, mobile, and web clock-in. Workyard's pricing page starts at $6 per user per month billed annually and lists a GPS time clock app with geofenced clock-in.

For field crews on job sites, Workyard fits best. For office teams that start timers from a phone, Toggl Track fits. For teams that want free attendance tracking with invoicing from tracked hours, Jibble fits.

What Makes Time Tracking Project-Based

Generic time tracking tells you how long someone worked. Project-based time tracking tells you how long someone worked on what — and what that work cost relative to what you charged. The distinction matters because agency profitability isn't one number. It's a number per client, per project, per retainer.

A project-based tool needs to do three things well. First, it maps hours to specific projects or clients automatically, without requiring your team to remember to switch timers between tasks. Second, it applies cost rates — each team member's fully-loaded hourly cost — to those hours. Third, it compares that cost data against revenue to produce margin reports at the project level.

Without all three, you're stuck exporting CSVs into a spreadsheet to do the math yourself. That works for a five-person team with three clients. It breaks down fast when you're running 15 projects across eight clients with a team of 20.

How Five Tools Compare

Tool-by-Tool Breakdown

Rize — Automatic Capture with AI Categorization

Rize works differently from the other tools on this list. Instead of requiring your team to start timers or fill out timesheets, it runs quietly in the background and captures time automatically based on which applications and websites are in use. When a designer spends 45 minutes in Figma on a client project, Rize logs it. When they switch to Slack for 10 minutes to discuss a different project, that gets categorized separately. No manual input required.

The AI categorization assigns time to projects and clients based on patterns — window titles, URLs, application context. This means you get a granular breakdown of where hours went without anyone on your team needing to remember to click a button. For profitability, Rize's project profitability dashboards show cost and revenue data per project, making it straightforward to identify which clients are profitable and which are quietly burning margin.

Rize's Team plan is $29.99 per seat per month billed annually ($39.99 monthly) and includes budgets plus client and project profitability reports. In the Momentum Studio case study, CEO Ben Jackson describes the capture workflow: "Rize allows my team to get deep into work and go where their creativity leads them without really having to think about time tracking." Rize also has built-in invoicing, but does not replace a full PSA or project-management system with Gantt charts. There is no native QuickBooks or Xero integration.

How do automatic hours become project profitability reports?

Project delivery margin comes from reviewed hours, staff cost rates, project revenue, and direct delivery expenses, not from activity tracking alone.

1. Set up clients and projects, then enter the fixed fee or recurring retainer and the delivery budget.
2. Assign staff cost rates on a consistent basis, so senior and junior delivery hours are not treated as equally expensive.
3. Let Rize draft time entries from desktop activity. Have staff correct client/project assignments and review the entries before reporting.
4. Compare reviewed hours and labor cost with each client or project's revenue and budget in Rize's profitability reports.
5. Account for contractors and other direct expenses when evaluating delivery margin. Do not mistake a labor-only view for net business profit.

Illustrative example, not a customer result: a $10,000 fixed-fee project with 100 delivery hours at a $50 hourly cost and $1,000 in contractor expenses has $4,000 in delivery profit, or a 40% margin. At 140 hours, the same project has a 20% margin. The fee has not changed; extra delivery effort has. Use the same cost basis when comparing projects.

For a retainer, review monthly retainer burn before the month ends. For an accounting engagement, compare actual delivery cost with the flat fee rather than judging performance by billable hours alone.

Key strengths

• Fully automatic time capture — no timers, no manual entry, no forgotten hours
• AI categorization assigns time to the correct project based on app context and window titles
• Team profitability dashboards show cost vs. revenue per project in real time

Possible limitations

• No native QuickBooks or Xero integration; hours reach accounting through Zapier or CSV export
• Desktop-only — no mobile app for tracking time away from a computer
• Less suited for teams that need Gantt charts or project management features alongside tracking

Harvest — Mature Manual Tracking with Budget Alerts

Harvest has been around since 2006, and it shows — in a good way. The project/task hierarchy is clean, the reporting is solid, and the integration list covers most PM tools. Budget tracking alerts you when a project passes 80% of its hour budget, which is useful for catching overruns before they become losses.

Harvest uses manual timers and timesheets, so teams need a reliable review process for missed entries. According to Harvest's pricing page, its Enterprise plan includes profitability reporting for clients, projects, tasks, and teams. Do not confuse a lower-tier budget report with that feature; compare the plan required for your reporting needs. For a head-to-head on capture accuracy vs invoicing depth, see Rize vs Harvest (2026).

Key strengths

• Mature product with a wide integration ecosystem covering most PM and accounting tools
• Budget alerts notify you when a project hits 80% of its hour budget
• Built-in invoicing with QuickBooks and Xero sync

Possible limitations

• Entirely manual — data accuracy depends on team discipline with timers
• Profitability reporting requires the Enterprise tier, not the Teams plan's budget reports
• Short tasks and context switches are frequently missed in manual logging

BigTime — Built for Professional Services Billing

BigTime is designed for accounting firms, consultancies, and other professional services businesses where project billing is the core revenue model. Its per-project P&L reports are strong: you can see margin by project, by client, by phase, with cost rates applied automatically. The invoicing workflow is tightly integrated, so hours flow directly into bills. BigTime Essentials starts at $20 per user per month.

The downside is complexity. BigTime is more than a time tracker — it's a PSA (professional services automation) platform. Setup takes longer, the learning curve is steeper, and the interface prioritizes power over simplicity. For creative agencies that want quick visibility into margins without managing a full PSA system, it can feel like overkill.

Key strengths

• Per-project P&L reports with phase-level and client-level margin breakdowns
• Tightly integrated invoicing — hours flow directly into bills
• Purpose-built for professional services firms with complex billing structures

Possible limitations

• Steep learning curve and longer setup time compared to simpler trackers
• Manual timesheet entry — no automatic time capture
• Can feel like overkill for creative agencies that need quick margin visibility without full PSA

TMetric — Budget-Friendly with Solid Basics

TMetric's pricing makes it accessible for smaller teams. The Professional plan is $7 per user per month billed monthly, and it covers project tracking, cost rates, and billable hour summaries. The browser extension integrates with tools like ClickUp, Jira, and Asana, letting you start timers from within your PM tool.

The profitability reporting is limited compared to BigTime or Rize. You can compare billable vs. non-billable hours, but generating a true margin report by project requires manual calculation. TMetric is a good starting point for teams that need project-level visibility without a large per-seat cost.

Key strengths

• Professional plan at $7/user/month, billed monthly
• Browser extension integrates with ClickUp, Jira, and Asana for in-context timer starts
• Billable vs. non-billable hour summaries with cost rate support

Possible limitations

• No true margin-per-project reporting — requires manual calculation for profitability
• Manual timer-based tracking with no automatic capture option
• Reporting depth is limited compared to BigTime or Rize

Beebole — Structured Reporting for Mid-Size Teams

Beebole's strength is its reporting flexibility. Custom fields, subproject hierarchies, and configurable dashboards let you slice time data in ways that match your billing structure. The margin reports compare cost rates against bill rates at the project level, which gives you a clearer profitability view than most manual trackers.

Like Harvest and TMetric, Beebole relies on manual entry — in this case, a weekly timesheet grid. The data quality depends entirely on whether your team fills it in accurately and on time. For teams that already have strong timesheet discipline, Beebole's reporting capabilities make it a solid option. For teams where compliance is a struggle, the data gaps will undermine the margin reports.

Key strengths

• Flexible reporting with custom fields, subproject hierarchies, and configurable dashboards
• Margin reports compare cost rates against bill rates at the project level
• Weekly timesheet grid suits teams with established timesheet habits

Possible limitations

• Manual weekly timesheet entry — data quality depends on team compliance
• No automatic time capture or AI categorization
• Less suited for teams that struggle with consistent timesheet submission

Clockify — Free-to-Start Tracking with Project Budgets

Clockify's draw is cost: a free tier covers core tracking, and paid plans add budgets, estimated-vs-actual alerts, expense tracking, and multi-project reporting. For teams auditing a large portfolio of projects on a budget, it covers a lot of ground.

Clockify users can run timers or record activity with its desktop auto tracker, then convert those activities into project time entries. Recorded activities stay local until the user adds them to the timesheet with a project. Review and project assignment determine which recorded activities reach the profitability report.

Key strengths

• Free tier covers core time tracking and basic project reporting
• Project budgets with estimated-vs-actual alerts and expense tracking
• Scales to large project portfolios without a large per-seat cost

Possible limitations

• Recorded activities must be converted to time entries and assigned to projects
• Auto tracker records app usage but does not categorize hours to projects automatically
• No AI-driven client or project attribution

Desklog — Automatic Capture with Activity Monitoring

Desklog combines automated background tracking with app and URL monitoring, then layers project profit/loss reporting on top using resource costs and utilization data. For operations and finance teams that want passive capture plus financial visibility, it is one of the few manual-tracker alternatives that actually automates collection.

Desklog also offers employee monitoring features, including app and URL tracking, idle-time analysis, and optional screenshot capture. Check the enabled settings, not just the product label, when evaluating team privacy. Rize emphasizes automatic capture with review-and-approve controls and private raw activity; Vision is off by default.

Key strengths

• Automatic background time capture with project profit/loss reporting
• App and URL monitoring for teams that want activity oversight
• Cost-rate-based P&L per project without manual timesheets

Possible limitations

• Surveillance-oriented feature set can be a hard sell for privacy-conscious teams
• Activity-monitoring data is not the same as AI-categorized client and project attribution
• Check project setup and reporting against your retainer or fixed-fee workflow before choosing

How Project-Level Profitability Reporting Works

The data pipeline from tracked hours to a useful margin dashboard has four stages. Getting each one right determines whether your profitability numbers reflect reality or just approximate it.

Stage 1: Time capture. Hours are recorded and assigned to a project. In manual tools, this means someone selects a project from a dropdown and starts a timer. In Rize, this happens automatically — Figma time gets tagged to "Client A – Brand Refresh" based on the file name and AI pattern matching.

Stage 2: Cost assignment. Each tracked hour gets multiplied by the team member's fully-loaded cost rate. A senior developer at $65/hour working 12 hours on a project adds $780 to the delivery cost. Fully-loaded means more than salary: employer payroll taxes alone add 7.65% in the US, since the IRS sets the employer share at 6.2% for Social Security and 1.45% for Medicare. Most project-based tools let you set cost rates per team member. Our team profitability tracking calculator walks through how to set these rates and model margins for your specific team size.

Stage 3: Revenue mapping. Project revenue — whether from a fixed bid, retainer, or hourly billing — is entered or synced from your invoicing tool. The system now has both sides of the equation: what it cost you and what you charged.

Stage 4: Margin calculation. Revenue minus delivery cost, divided by revenue, gives you delivery margin per project. As an illustration, a $15,000 project with $8,500 in labor and $500 in direct costs has a 40% margin. If your target is 50%, investigate the extra hours or expenses before using the same estimate for another project. Net business profit also depends on costs outside project delivery.

Why Automatic Capture Changes the Math

Here's the problem with building profitability reports on manual time data: the hours are wrong. People forget to start timers, round durations, and skip short tasks entirely. The gap between what actually happened and what gets logged compounds across a team and a week. When you're running margin calculations on undercounted hours, every project looks more profitable than it actually is.

Consider a real example. A designer works on a Figma mockup for a client, gets pulled into a Zoom call about the same project, then spends 20 minutes in Slack answering questions about it. With a manual timer, they probably logged the Figma time. The Zoom call might get logged if they remembered. The Slack time almost clearly didn't. That's 20-30 minutes of billable work that disappeared from the record and from the profitability calculation. Those switches add up. According to a 2022 Harvard Business Review study, workers toggled between apps roughly 1,200 times a day, and Gloria Mark's research at UC Irvine found it takes about 23 minutes to refocus after an interruption.

Rize captures all three activities automatically. The Figma session, the Zoom meeting, and the Slack conversation all get logged and categorized to the correct project. Over a week, this difference compounds. Over a quarter, it can mean the difference between a project showing 52% margin and the real number of 38%.

The Momentum Studio case study describes background capture as a way to avoid interrupting creative work with timers. The Impulse Lab case study shows how founder Leonard Roussard uses client effort in reporting: "We use Rize to know: 'We spent 30 hours on this client and got this result.' That's powerful when you're working lean and launching quickly." These accounts describe workflow benefits; they do not establish a guaranteed percentage improvement in profitability.

How to Choose Project-Based Time Tracking Software

Before comparing tools, run through these seven criteria to narrow the field based on how your team actually works.

1. Data capture method. Does your team reliably start and stop timers, or do hours go unlogged? If compliance is low, automatic capture eliminates the gap between work done and work recorded.
2. Profitability reporting depth. Do you need a simple billable vs. non-billable split, or per-project P&L with phase-level margins? Match the tool's reporting to the financial questions you need answered.
3. Cost rate granularity. Can you set fully-loaded cost rates per team member, per role, or per project? Without accurate cost rates, margin calculations are unreliable regardless of how good the time data is.
4. Integration with your billing stack. If you invoice through QuickBooks, Xero, or FreshBooks, check whether the tool syncs hours and rates directly or requires CSV exports.
5. Team size and budget. Per-seat pricing adds up fast. A 20-person team at $20/user/month is $4,800/year — weigh that against the margin visibility you gain.
6. Setup and onboarding time. PSA platforms like BigTime offer deep functionality but take weeks to configure. Lighter tools like Rize or TMetric can be running in under an hour.
7. Multi-project switching. If your team juggles 5+ projects daily, evaluate how the tool handles context switches. Manual timers miss transitions; automatic capture logs them by default.

Picking the Right Tool for Your Team

The right choice depends on where your pain is. If your team already tracks time diligently and you need better reporting, Beebole or BigTime will give you structured margin data. If you're starting from scratch and want a low-cost entry point, TMetric covers the basics. If you need accurate hours without changing your team's workflow, Rize's automatic tracking solves the data collection problem at the source — see how agencies use it for client-level margins. For a wider field, see our rankings of project time tracking software and agency profitability software.

From what I have seen working with agency teams over the past two years, the bottleneck isn't reporting — it's the data going into the reports. A profitability dashboard built on inaccurate hours produces confident-looking numbers that are wrong. That's worse than no dashboard at all, because it hides the problem. Start with accurate capture, then build the margin analysis on top. The team profitability calculator guide walks through the math step by step. Accounting firms comparing trackers for flat-fee client margin should also see best Karbon alternatives for time tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best project-based time tracking software for profitability reporting?

It depends on your workflow. For automatic time capture with AI-powered project categorization, Rize produces the most accurate data with the least manual effort. BigTime offers the strongest built-in P&L reports for professional services firms. Beebole gives mid-size teams flexible margin reporting on its Advanced plan. The best choice hinges on whether your priority is data accuracy (Rize), billing integration (BigTime), or budget (TMetric).

What is the best time tracking vendor for project-based tracking and profitability by client?

For client-level profitability, you need a tool that maps hours to specific clients and applies cost rates per team member. Rize does this automatically using AI categorization — hours spent in Figma, ClickUp, Slack, and Zoom get assigned to the correct client without manual tagging. BigTime and Beebole also support client-level reporting but require manual time entry to feed the data.

Which time tracking provider has the best profitability dashboards?

BigTime has the most detailed built-in profitability dashboards, with per-project P&L, phase-level margins, and utilization views designed for professional services. Rize's team dashboards give a cleaner, faster view of cost vs. revenue per project and are built on automatically captured data — which means the dashboard numbers reflect actual work, not self-reported estimates.

How does automatic time tracking improve profitability accuracy?

Manual time tracking relies on memory, which means forgotten timers, rounded durations, and skipped short tasks. Those gaps compound across a team. Automatic tracking captures every application switch, meeting, and work session without relying on human memory. This means profitability reports built on automatic data reflect actual delivery costs, not approximations — which prevents the common pattern of projects looking profitable on paper while losing money in practice.

What features should a team profitability calculator include?

A useful profitability calculator needs four inputs: project revenue, hours per team member, fully-loaded cost rates (salary plus benefits, taxes, and overhead), and direct project expenses. The output should show gross profit and gross margin per project. The best tools also show utilization rates and flag projects that fall below your target margin. Rize's free profit calculator estimates hidden revenue loss based on your team size, rates, and current tracking method.