AI tool comparison

Cursor vs Windsurf

A data-driven comparison of Cursor (AI Code Editor) and Windsurf (AI Code Editor) — features, GitHub momentum, and which tool fits your workflow.

Cursor

AI Code Editor

Private$2.5B (2024)

Windsurf

AI Code Editor

PrivateCodeium

Feature comparison

Feature
Cursor
Windsurf
Base
Fork of VS Code
Fork of VS Code
Avg daily usage (Rize)
14.8 min/user/day
5.0 min/user/day
Model support
Claude, GPT, custom
Codeium models + Claude, GPT
Autonomous coding
Tab + chat + agent
Cascade (autonomous agent)
Pricing
Free + $20/mo Pro
Free + $15/mo Pro
Unique differentiator
Largest AI editor user base
Cascade multi-step agent

Track your AI tool usage with Rize

AI code editors can consume hours of deep focus. Rize tracks time in Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, and every other dev tool automatically to show where your coding time actually goes.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Cursor and Windsurf?

Cursor is a AI Code Editor while Windsurf is a AI Code Editor. Key differences include: Base (Cursor: Fork of VS Code, Windsurf: Fork of VS Code); Avg daily usage (Rize) (Cursor: 14.8 min/user/day, Windsurf: 5.0 min/user/day); Model support (Cursor: Claude, GPT, custom, Windsurf: Codeium models + Claude, GPT).

Which is more popular, Cursor or Windsurf?

Both tools are actively developed open-source projects. Check the live GitHub stats above for the latest popularity data.

Can Rize track time spent in Cursor and Windsurf?

Yes. Rize automatically detects and tracks time spent in both Cursor and Windsurf. It runs in the background and categorizes your AI tool usage by project and client — no manual timers needed.

Related comparisons